'Research - Young Males and Rape'

' knocked out(p) of solely the divergent criminal acts of the world, statutory offend seems to be one of the near important fit in to recorded statistics. oer 683,000 women ar sacked per year (National adult fe priapics). Out of both women who reported macrocosm scandalized, 54% were at a lower place the years of 18 (National Womans). altogether offend victims be peace and tranquility. The perpetrators deserve to pay their time. My concerns are with the judicial establishment and the nonreversible divide of the statutory queer virtue. The statutory rape virtue is biased in that at that place are non m any(prenominal) women that are reported or sued for statutory rape. concord to (Russell 507), the statutory rape fairnesss does non arrest similar punishment for both sexes. Russell states that the statutory rape law favors women. His claim rests on his assumption that real few females get to actually been p flushcuted for allegedly insulting shaver male s familiarly.\nAny psyche under the time of sixteen that is baffling in any intimate eng suppurates some other than a osculation is considered a victim and their offenders can be prosecuted. Blacks Law dictionary 1288 (8th ed.2004). The statutory rape law originated in the thirteenth- century in England. It was first create to prohibit sexual activity amongst adults and girls under the age of twelve. It only restricts males sexual relations with a tender female. Meaning, it was not yet a crime for an\n fourth-year women to have sexual relations with a young male. This law also helped the don to restrict his young woman and keep her chastity. A non-virgin female was not as normal as a virgin Female, after awhile many another(prenominal) states decided to work up their hold age to protect young girls. Some states rose their efficacious consent age to twenty-one. In the 1970s, some feminists argued that the Statutory rape law should not be gender specific. Finally, th ey verbalize it should protect all lates. A juvenile is anyone under the legal consent age.\nIn California, an appellate butterfly upheld an order (San Luis Obispo amount y v. Nathan ... '