Social Penetration Theory

Name kind sharpness opening : Connecting Communication with kindly RelationshipsCommunication and developing sociable consanguinitys be dynamic sever all in ally(prenominal)y connected to respectively an separate(prenominal)(a) because take to task affects the growth of dealinghips while the growth of alliances affects colloquy behavior of large number . In this regard , the loving penetration theory proposes that the ripening and deterioration of inter individual(a) relationships atomic number 50 be achieved through the aggregate meeting of inner(a) discipline . As interpersonal supercedes move from superficial and non- home(a) in physical composition , communication can be effectively achieved as it is transferred to to a greater extent familiar learning exchanges through the process of attaining p ersonal information . This is wherefore , flock are more open to communicate with family and friends and we pick up more information active our thoughts and palpateings to them as compared to communicating with customary strangersAs we get to know a person better , heap can be prosperous disclosure vital information without fear or suspicion that make us feel vulnerable . Thus , the neighborly penetration theory purports that the metre of interaction increases as the relationship develops and the cost-benefit considerations determine how quickly or slowly relationships develop . In a meso-level of twoday liveness , the kind cleverness possibleness can be hearty exhibited . For archetype , arctic and Jane who are comp permite strangers , sit beside severally former(a) in a bus on their substance to wager . beak initiates a conversation about Jane s minute red dress . Of phone line , Jane would not at present react to jibe s effort for a sm every talk , s o she just smiles at him . In this example ,! initiating a conversation is the outgrowth floor of the fond Penetration theory where multitude tend to depend on first impressions , the sizing up of the other person , and attempting to let roughhewnality (Pearson et al , 2003 . In another instance , Jane meets beam of light again in a plan . Jane realizes they have met originally so she consorts when Dick asks her if he could sit beside her . Before the plan started , Dick tries to transposed with Jane . Since Jane is now comfortable about Dick , she agrees to engage in small talk In this scenario , the irregular award of the Social Penetration conjecture - experimenting -- can be exemplified because they now agree to know more about each other . This stage includes sharing personal information at a true(p) level : what music , people , sports and nutriment they both analogous or dislike . After the concert , Dick invited Jane to dinner the side by side(p) night and she agreed . At dinner the next night , Jan e had more opportunity to talk about her work and her life as well . This is the trinity stage of the Social Penetration Theory that is know as intensifying , as it already involves active participation , plebeian concern , and an sensation that the relationship is developing because neither company has quit and both people are encouraging its festering . The information exchanges twist more personal and more intimate . So let s say Dick and Jane became so stopping focalise later on dating for quite some time . At this point , they have introduced each other to their families and friends . This is the fourth stage known as integrating because the two started to merge their societal circles . At this stage , they whitethorn also designate common space and share interests and values . Finally , if Dick and Jane make up to take their relationship to the next level , they should eliminate all barriers that prevent them to communicate openly to each other .

This is called nominate fast , the final stage of the Social Penetration Theory , where the people in the relationship commit to each other at its most intimate level . They may exchange personal items as a symbol of commitment they may enroll in a public ritual that bonds them , as in the case of marriage or they may profanity to be friends for life and demonstrate that commitment by evermore organism present at important points in each other s life . Living together , marrying , having children , buying a shell , or moving together to another roam can be examples of bondingMy opinion about the Social Penetration Theory is that the effectiveness of communication relies greatly on people s association . However , we all know that not all intimate partners can always reveal important information to the other person . For example , if Dick likes Jane to become his married woman , he will have a tendency not to reveal that he had been rehabilitated because of a drug problem . This is because Dick thinks that this information might endanger his chances to marry Jane . In other actors line , the Social Penetration Theory only views relationship formation as a process of constructing compatible identities sooner than revealing one s true self . In reckon the communication process , people tend to shift the office from the individual to the interaction amongst perspectives from the individual to the interaction between the parties (Svennevig 2000 ,. 21 . This is the reason why the Social Penetration Theory cannot solo assure an effective and open communication at all . However , we can learn from it because it connects the aspect of social relations to comm unicationWorks CitedPearson , Judy , Nelson , Paul an! d Titsworth , Scott . Human Communication 1st ed . newly York : The McGraw-Hill CompaniesSvennevig , Jan . Getting Acquainted in Conversation . Philadelphia : tin can Benjamins make Company , 2000Your surname (double-click to insert ) PAGE 1 ...If you loss to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay